Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 940MX and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1242MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.02GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 940MX +695%
0.954 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 900M
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1004 MHz
Base Clock
-
1242 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.936 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
29.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
953.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
29.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

23W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
M76
N16S-GTR-S
GPU Variant
M76-M (216MJBKA13FG)
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.39 billion
Unknown
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy