Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +6264%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
89.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy