Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +8932%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
156.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
475W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Vega 20
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy