Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
0.448 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +1682%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
46.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Capsaicin
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy