Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
0.448 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1178%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
46.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Ellesmere
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy