Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
0.448 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +4426%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
72
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
46.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Navi 21
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy