Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce G103M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce G103M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce G103M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce G103M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce G103M
0.026 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +34284%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 100M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
2.560 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
AD107
N10M-GE2-S
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

14W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy