Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800 +150%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 100
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

105W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94B
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy