CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 220 OEM
0.097 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+5805%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220 OEM
VS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
48
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.048 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
8.096 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
97.15 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Board Design
58W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5550
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs AMD Radeon 550X 640SP
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy