Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 220
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +2264%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

58W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy