Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +740%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1440
48
TMUs
72
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Cypress
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy