Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
19360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +33950%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3e
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
19456
48
TMUs
1216
12
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
153 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy