Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 230M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230M
0.106 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +8333%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
24
48
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
105.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
AD107
N10P-GE-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy