Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
16800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +24055%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
132
96
Shading Units
16896
32
TMUs
528
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GB100
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
208 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
9.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy