Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs ATI FireGL V8600

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (69W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600 +71%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

69W
TDP
159W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
R600
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy