Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD FirePro W5000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD FirePro W5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000 +392%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy