Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +1155%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy