Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +696%
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Aug 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1152
32
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GK104
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy