Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 9100 +4682%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jul 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Vega 10
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy