Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +2091%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
580W
250 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Hawaii
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy