Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY +2689%
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Fiji
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy