Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240M
0.116 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +10546%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
24
48
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
AD107
N10P-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy