Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs Intel Arc Pro A50

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +2460%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 300
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
72
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy