Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100 +243%
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 300
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
72
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy