Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 300M
Generation
M5x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
24
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
M56
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

23W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy