CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Score
GeForce GT 320M
VS
Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 300M
Generation
M5x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
24
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
M56
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Board Design
23W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
2
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
4
AMD Radeon R9 M270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
5
AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
7
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy