Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (27.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM +703%
0.257 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 300
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

69W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV620
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy