Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +138%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 300
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Cayman
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy