Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +1008%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
14
96
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
TU106
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy