NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+1008%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
14
96
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
TU116
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
