Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +12331%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Nov 2023
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Navi 32
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy