Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (49W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +271%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

49W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
RV770
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy