Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +354%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 500
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
134.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
11.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Cayman
GF119 B1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy