Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +2110%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 500
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
48
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
134.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
11.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
TU117
GF119 B1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy