Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +2551%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 500
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
134.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
11.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Navi 24
GF119 B1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy