Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +1302%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 500
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
2
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
134.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
11.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF119 B1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy