Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
Lower TDP (29W vs 35W)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
72 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 PCI +9%
0.156 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 500
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
120
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

29W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV630
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy