Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +2460%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 500
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy