Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +3571%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 500
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy