Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +510%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 500
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy