NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 610 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 610
0.156 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
+218%
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
898 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.37GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
29W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
RV670
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
