Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 630
0.311 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +975%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
311.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy