Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM vs Intel Arc Pro A50

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640 OEM
0.612 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +686%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 600
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
25.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
612.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
25.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GK107-320-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy