NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
+20%
0.833 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 700M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Opal
GT 755M
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
