Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD FirePro M8900

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +580%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 100M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Blackcomb
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy