Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1605MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +4180%
8.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 100M
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
64
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
AD107
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
Unknown
240 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy