Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.44GB/s)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition +170%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 100M
Generation
Manhattan
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
795 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.44GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Madison
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Madison XT (216-0772003)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy