Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.41GB/s)
AMD Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition +25%
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 100M
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
794 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.41GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
160
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Seymour
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Seymour XTX M2 (216-0809000)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy