CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon Pro 555
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon Pro 555
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
AMD Radeon Pro 555
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 555 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 555
+580%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
VS
Radeon Pro 555
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 100M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1275 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1306 GFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
Polaris 21
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 PRO
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
3 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon HD 8670M
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon HD 7770M
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy