Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon Pro 555

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon Pro 555

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 555 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 555 +580%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 100M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1275 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1306 GFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Polaris 21
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 PRO
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
3 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy