Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock940MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255 +275%
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 100M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
940 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Topaz
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy