Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265 +229%
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 100M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
64
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Opal
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy